Chinese Automakers Sell Carbon Credits to Europe

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes · Last updated: 2 October 2026

XPENG has struck carbon-credit agreements with Porsche and other international automakers that cover EU, UK and Australian compliance, and the deal value tops 1 billion yuan, with XPENG poised to earn more than 500 million yuan from credits in 2026. As first reported by Gasgoo, the transactions convert Chinese pure-electric sales into tradable compliance assets that higher-emitting brands can buy to avoid EU fines tied to the 93.6 g/km fleet target. The mechanism is simple: low-emission makers supply surplus credits into open pools; high-emission brands use those credits to reduce or defer penalties measured under the EU three-year 2025–2027 assessment.

The next stage of going global isn't just about product competitiveness—it’s about understanding global rules.

one industry view

How carbon-credit deals translate EV sales into compliance cash

European rules set a fleet-average CO2 ceiling of 93.6 grams per kilometre from 2025 and impose a fine of 95 euros for every gram a vehicle exceeds that target. That penalty formula gives high-emission brands a calculable cost for non-compliance and creates demand for transferable credits produced by low-emission fleets. Open pooling lets a pure-electric maker’s surplus credits be applied against another brand’s excess emissions; XPENG is selling credits into those markets as a result.

The legal framework measures compliance using a three-year average covering 2025–2027, which allows companies to defer liabilities but not eliminate them. Industry estimates put potential sector-wide fines as high as 15 billion euros, making the purchase of credits a practical alternative to paying penalties directly. For individual groups the sums are material: Volkswagen Group reported a 100 g/km fleet average for 2025, and CFO Arno Antlitz has quantified possible cumulative fines of about 1.5 billion euros for 2025–2027 and annual penalties in the 400–500 million-euro range if targets are missed.

Why XPENG and other Chinese EV makers can supply those credits

XPENG’s overseas momentum is the operational basis for its credit supply. In Q2 2026 the company’s overseas sales exceeded 20,000 units, an 81% year-on-year rise, and first-half overseas revenue made up more than 25% of total revenue. Reported average selling prices in those markets were above 40,000 euros, giving XPENG higher per-vehicle revenue and gross profit among Chinese NEV exporters.

That sustained presence in multiple European markets—XPENG ranked first among Chinese pure-electric brands in countries including Norway, Denmark, France and Portugal from January to July 2026—means its credits are more predictable than one-off export spikes. The company has packaged those performance advantages into trading agreements that the market values: the current round of contracts is reported to exceed 1 billion yuan, with credit income of over 500 million yuan expected in 2026 alone.

What these partnerships change for incumbent brands and alliances

Porsche’s decision to leave Volkswagen Group’s internal emissions pool and form an open pool with XPENG is a strategic pivot. It removes Porsche’s higher-emission models from the group average and lets Porsche manage compliance costs directly through purchased credits. Dataforce figures cited show Porsche’s fleet average rose to 130.2 g/km through June 2026, up from 118.5 g/km in the same period of 2025; contemporaneous sales trends saw Taycan volumes down about 20% year-on-year and the electric Macan down about 30% in Europe.

Other open pools already exist: Tesla’s pool includes Ford, Honda, Mazda and Suzuki; Mercedes-Benz manages another with Volvo, Polestar and Smart. The Porsche-XPENG pool is being run by Porsche and covers 2026 and 2027, and it is open to additional entrants. These arrangements recast compliance from internal group allocation toward market transactions between firms and reposition Chinese EV makers as providers of a tradable regulatory service as well as of vehicles.

Limits to reliance on carbon credit income and the supply-chain challenge

Carbon-credit sales boost near-term revenue but are policy-dependent and cannot substitute for structural decarbonisation. The EU’s shift to a three-year averaging method for 2025–2027 illustrates how regulatory design affects scarcity and price: if targets are relaxed or pricing mechanisms change, trading value can shrink. Leapmotor’s 2025 credit sales to Stellantis generated 1.11 billion yuan, and its 2026 cap rose to 2.8 billion yuan—examples of sizeable one-off receipts that still leave underlying supply-chain emissions untouched.

XPENG is diversifying beyond vehicle margins: in Q2 2026 non-vehicle services accounted for 13.7% of revenue but supplied 49.6% of gross profit, with R&D services for Volkswagen Group showing a gross margin of 75.1%. The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism — currently focused on commodities such as steel and aluminium — will transmit material costs to vehicle makers unless emissions from raw materials are addressed.

Two plausible paths for carbon trading in autos

The bottom line

The recent rounds of credit trading make Chinese EV makers commercial partners in compliance as well as suppliers of cars. XPENG’s reported deals—exceeding 1 billion yuan in aggregate and with more than 500 million yuan of expected credit revenue in 2026—show how export-led electrification can be monetised under the EU’s 93.6 g/km rule and its 95-euro-per-gram penalty. Yet the model depends on regulatory design and the durability of credit scarcity: changes to averaging, targets or carbon pricing would alter the calculus. For the long term, automakers must pair trading strategies with deeper supply‑chain decarbonisation and stronger carbon-data governance.

What to watch

• watch for the EU compliance assessment covering 2025–2027 and its practical conclusions due in 2027; no later regulatory interpretation will matter more for credit prices.
• watch for settlement and accounting of the Porsche–XPENG open pool covering 2026 and 2027, with final credit allocations expected in 2027.
• watch for any formal expansion of CBAM coverage toward automotive inputs; no date has been set for that extension.