Blog
AECOM Joins Ontario Pumped Storage Project in Meaford
- September 8, 2026
- Posted by: Clean Energy Skills
- Category: Long-Duration Energy Storage

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes · Last updated:
AECOM will support engineering and planning for the Ontario Pumped Storage Project (OPSP) near Meaford, Ontario. TC Energy is leading the project, with Worley and EllisDon on the delivery team; TC Energy expects the OPSP to provide about 1,000 megawatts of generation and roughly 10,600 megawatt‑hours of stored energy. Pumped‑storage hydroelectricity captures surplus power by pumping water to an upper reservoir and later releasing it through turbines, producing discharge over hours rather than minutes. AECOM’s work will focus on underground works, hydraulic systems and design optimisation as the OPSP moves through engineering, planning and regulatory stages.
The Ontario Pumped Storage Project represents an opportunity to apply proven technology at a scale that can help meet the province's future electricity needs
Richard Barrett, Chief Executive of AECOM's Canada region
Key takeaways
- Partnership: Worley has engaged AECOM to support the next phase of development on the Ontario Pumped Storage Project alongside EllisDon and TC Energy.
- Capacity: TC Energy expects the OPSP to deliver about 1,000 megawatts of generation capacity.
- Storage: The OPSP is expected to provide 10,600 megawatt-hours of energy storage.
- Technology share: Pumped-storage hydro currently accounts for roughly 95% of installed energy storage capacity worldwide.
Table of contents
Why Ontario is planning long‑duration storage now
Ontario’s system planners and developers are preparing for a period of rising electricity demand, and that projected growth is the backdrop for the OPSP. Long‑duration storage—capable of discharging for multiple hours—lets operators shift large blocks of energy from low-demand periods into peak hours, reducing the need for fast-start thermal plants or very large curtailment of wind and solar output. The OPSP is designed to work at grid scale rather than as a short‑term battery: its reported specification of 10,600 megawatt‑hours paired with 1,000 megawatts of output implies multi‑hour discharge suitable for daily or longer peak windows.
Policy and market design questions remain unresolved. The Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) is reviewing aspects of the proposal—including proposals for a long‑term revenue framework and arrangements for cost recovery—and the IESO's conclusions will influence whether a large pumped‑storage facility can secure predictable returns under Ontario’s market rules. Those commercial signals will affect whether the OPSP progresses from engineering studies into construction.
What AECOM will deliver on the OPSP
AECOM’s role is technical and execution‑oriented within the Worley‑led team. The firm will support advancement of underground works, develop and test hydraulic system designs, optimise constructability and operability, contribute to cost and schedule development, and support formal risk assessment and other engineering activities. Those tasks are core to preparing a large subterranean pumped storage scheme for permitting and later construction.
Large pumped storage projects place particular emphasis on underground civil design and hydraulic control systems because both affect safety, operability and lifecycle costs. AECOM’s global hydropower experience is what Worley and TC Energy have sought for these technical elements; EllisDon will provide Canadian construction and local supply‑chain input. Together the team is intended to close technical gaps that typically slow readiness for financing and regulatory approval.
Local partners, the Saugeen Ojibway Nation and regulatory steps ahead
The OPSP site sits on land in the territory of the Saugeen Ojibway Nation, and TC Energy has positioned the Nation as a potential co‑developer and joint owner if the project proceeds. That relationship is central: negotiated co‑development terms and any benefits package will be part of the project's route to social licence and permitting. TC Energy names the Saugeen Ojibway Nation and links the outcome of those negotiations directly to the project's ability to advance.
On the regulatory side the IESO’s review of a possible long‑term revenue framework and any cost recovery agreement is a named step that must progress in parallel with engineering. Environmental assessment, permitting and Indigenous consultations are typical milestones for projects sited on Indigenous territory; the announcement positions Worley, AECOM and EllisDon to advance engineering while those approvals are sought. Each of those threads—indigenous negotiations, IESO commercial review and statutory approvals—must align for construction to become credible to financiers.
How the OPSP could progress
The case for
- Established technology and large existing know‑how in pumped storage reduce technical execution risk, supporting the case that the OPSP can deliver multi‑hour storage at scale.
- The engagement of named firms—Worley, AECOM and EllisDon—strengthens project readiness by combining engineering, hydropower experience and local construction capacity.
The case against
- A favourable commercial outcome depends on the IESO’s review of a long‑term revenue framework; without a clear revenue model, financing a large pumped storage plant will be harder.
- Negotiations over co‑development and joint ownership with the Saugeen Ojibway Nation must be resolved; unfinished agreements could delay permitting or add scope to the project.
What to be careful about
- Unresolved IESO decisions on a long‑term revenue framework could leave project economics unclear for investors and lenders.
- Co‑development and ownership talks with the Saugeen Ojibway Nation are ongoing and could materially change project timing or scope.
- Large underground civil works and complex hydraulic systems carry execution, cost and schedule risk common to pumped storage developments.
The bottom line
The AECOM appointment formalises a technical step for the Ontario Pumped Storage Project as it moves from concept into detailed engineering and planning. With 1,000 MW and 10,600 MWh of storage specified, the OPSP targets multi‑hour grid flexibility rather than short‑duration balancing. Delivery hinges on three named strands: the project team’s technical readiness (Worley, AECOM, EllisDon), commercial clarity from the IESO on revenue arrangements, and a negotiated development pathway with the Saugeen Ojibway Nation. If those elements align, the OPSP could become a long‑duration resource for Ontario; if they do not, timing and scope will be at risk.
What to watch
- Watch for the IESO’s decision on a potential long‑term revenue framework and cost recovery approach for the OPSP; no date has been set.
- Watch for the outcome of negotiations between TC Energy and the Saugeen Ojibway Nation on co‑development and joint ownership; no date has been set.
- Watch for TC Energy or the project team to file required regulatory applications or environmental assessments in Ontario; no date has been set.
Frequently asked questions
How large is the Ontario Pumped Storage Project?
TC Energy indicates the project would deliver roughly 1,000 megawatts of generation and about 10,600 megawatt‑hours of storage.
Who is delivering the OPSP and what are their roles?
TC Energy is the developer coordinating overall development; Worley is leading the engineering team; EllisDon contributes Canadian construction and local supply‑chain support; and AECOM will support underground works, hydraulic systems and constructability optimisation.
How long can the OPSP discharge at full output?
Based on the announced figures, 10,600 MWh of storage paired with 1,000 MW of capacity implies about 10.6 hours of continuous discharge at full output.
Related reading