Blog
Google-backed Texas battery pilot boosts hourly carbon matching
- September 22, 2026
- Posted by: Clean Energy Skills
- Category: Battery storage

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes · Last updated:
A Google-backed battery storage pilot in Texas tested whether grid-scale batteries can store surplus renewable energy and dispatch it at hours when a data center’s demand would otherwise rely on fossil generation. Quintrace, esVolta and LevelTen Energy ran the three-month test and report the batteries charged and discharged 9.2GWh while using hourly time-stamped Granular Certificates to shift environmental attributes. esVolta placed two utility-scale assets into the exercise — the Anole project (240MW/480MWh) in Seagoville and the Burksol project (100MW/200MWh) in Dickens County — while Quintrace provided the verification software and LevelTen managed registry accounts to avoid double-counting.
Key takeaways
- Quintrace, esVolta and LevelTen Energy said the pilot produced 9.2 GWh of charge–discharge activity during the test.
- esVolta contributed the Anole project (240MW/480MWh) in Seagoville and the Burksol project (100MW/200MWh) in Dickens County to the pilot.
- Quintrace supplied the software platform for verification and LevelTen managed the registry accounts and transaction framework to prevent double-counting.
Table of contents
What the Texas pilot did and what it measured
The pilot aimed to test a commercial and accounting pathway for using batteries to improve the hourly match between clean energy and a large buyer’s load. Over a three-month run, the partners report the assets charged and discharged a combined 9.2GWh while exchanging hourly environmental attributes. The experiment used time-stamped Granular Certificates to tag specific hours of solar production, then allotted those attributes to grid-connected batteries so they could be retired when the batteries discharged into hours of higher fossil generation.
Google entered contracts with the battery operators to shift when environmental attributes were assigned for energy the company already owned, as first reported by Data Center Dynamics; the arrangements did not transfer ownership of the storage assets to Google, and Google did not take on merchant or dispatch risk. The operators retained full operational control and could still respond to price signals and grid emergencies while participating in the attribute-shift structure.
Assets and participants in the trial
esVolta supplied two named utility-scale projects to the exercise: the Anole project, listed at 240MW/480MWh and located in Seagoville, Texas, and the Burksol project, listed at 100MW/200MWh in Dickens County, Texas. Quintrace supplied the software that verified hourly attributes, and LevelTen Energy managed registry accounts and established the transaction processes for the storage-shift agreements.
The partners present a separation of roles designed to protect operators’ commercial flexibility: asset owners remained free to dispatch for market prices and grid needs, while the verification and registry layers ensured the hourly environmental attributes that Google wanted to retire were tracked and prevented from being double-counted.
How the accounting and contracting worked
The pilot paired a technical dispatch outcome with an accounting stream. Granular Certificates were time-stamped to specific production hours; when batteries charged from that tagged energy and later discharged in a different hour, the certificate for the original hour was retired and the buyer received the environmental attribute for the hour it needed. LevelTen’s registry controls prevented the same hourly attribute being claimed more than once.
Partners framed the structure as a new commercial revenue source for storage: by creating an environmental price signal distinct from existing energy-market payments, the model is pitched to attract financing and reward dispatch that improves a buyer’s hour-by-hour clean-energy match rather than only responding to energy prices.
Quotes, precedent and where this fits in Google’s activity
Devin Hardman, chief commercial officer at esVolta, said: "Batteries are set to play an important role in how companies shape their sustainable energy strategies, not only in how the grid is balanced. This pilot shows storage can be reliably dispatched and credited to match clean energy to demand on a granular hourly basis, and that will shape those strategies and attract further investment into storage." That sentence is presented verbatim from the partners’ release.
Jason Tundermann, chief innovation officer at LevelTen Energy, added that the pilot introduced "a new price signal and contracting structure to the utility-scale storage market," and argued that at scale this could support financing and construction of more batteries. The partners also note Google has been active in other storage areas, most recently partnering with Energy Dome on a 23MW project in Rhode, Ireland.
| Project | Power (MW) | Energy (MWh) | Location | Role in pilot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anole | 240MW | 480MWh | Seagoville, Texas | Asset provided by esVolta |
| Burksol | 100MW | 200MWh | Dickens County, Texas | Asset provided by esVolta |
What could move this either way
The case for
- If market buyers accept hourly certificates, the mechanism could create a new revenue stream for storage developers and improve financing prospects for projects.
- Registry-level controls and third-party verification could make hourly attribute retirement auditable and reduce double-counting risk, increasing buyer confidence.
The case against
- The approach depends on buyers valuing hourly environmental attributes above and beyond existing market payments; if demand is thin the premium may not materialise.
- Regulatory or market rules that do not recognise hourly certificates for compliance or corporate reporting could limit the commercial value of the structure.
What to be careful about
- Failure of broader buyers to recognise or pay for hourly Granular Certificates would leave operators exposed to the same merchant risks they face today.
- Registry, auditing or settlement errors could permit double-counting of attributes unless controls are universally adopted and independently audited.
- Relying on attribute-shifting without changes to market or regulatory recognition may create contractual disputes over which hour’s emissions an attribute legitimately represents.
The bottom line
The Texas pilot demonstrates a practical way to link battery dispatch with an hourly environmental-accounting mechanism. By combining time-stamped Granular Certificates, registry controls and a contracting structure that leaves operators in control, the partners say the model can create an environmental revenue stream for storage while improving a buyer’s hour-by-hour clean-energy match. Whether that revenue stream scales depends on corporate demand for hourly attributes, registry interoperability, and whether market or regulatory frameworks formally recognise hourly retirement in corporate reporting and compliance.
What to watch
- Watch whether major corporate buyers formally adopt hourly Granular Certificates for reporting; no date has been set.
- Watch for registry or market rule changes that recognise hourly attribute retirement for compliance or voluntary reporting; no date has been set.
- Watch announcements from storage developers about financing driven by environmental attribute revenues at scale; no date has been set.
Frequently asked questions
How much energy did the pilot charge and discharge?
The partners reported the batteries cycled a combined 9.2 GWh over the three-month pilot period.
Which battery projects took part in the test?
esVolta supplied two projects: Anole (240MW/480MWh) in Seagoville and Burksol (100MW/200MWh) in Dickens County, Texas.
What roles did Quintrace and LevelTen play?
Quintrace provided the verification software platform and LevelTen Energy managed registry accounts and the transaction framework to prevent double-counting of hourly attributes.
Related reading