Blog
Second-life EV batteries could cut renewable curtailment
- September 30, 2026
- Posted by: Clean Energy Skills
- Category: Wind Energy

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes · Last updated:
Second‑life EV batteries can store surplus wind and solar output, lowering the need to curtail generation when networks are full. AFRY's analysis found that distribution‑grid queues across Europe contain 375 GW of planned clean‑energy generation alongside 455 GW of proposed battery storage; in 2024, 10 TWh of renewables were curtailed — a loss the EU values at €4.3 billion. Reusing retired EV packs, many with substantial usable energy remaining, can deliver local storage faster and cheaper than constructing new large battery plants and help shift generation toward evening and daytime demand peaks.
Old EV batteries really are a gold mine,
Adrian Hiel, director of Electrification Alliance
Key takeaways
- Grid queues: AFRY's analysis identified distribution‑grid queues across Europe that include 375 GW of planned clean‑energy generation and a further 455 GW earmarked for battery storage.
- Curtailment cost: In 2024 EU renewables curtailment totalled 10 TWh, which the article sets at €4.3 billion in wasted electricity.
- Second-life capacity: Most retired EV batteries still retain roughly 70–80% of their original usable capacity and can be repurposed for stationary storage.
- Scale of future supply: The IEA estimates more than one million EV batteries could reach end‑of‑life by 2030, while EV sales rose from 215,000 in 2016 to 4.2 million last year.
Table of contents
Why European grids curtail wind and solar
Europe’s transmission and distribution networks were designed around large, central fossil-fuel plants. Renewables are often remote and intermittent, so when generation exceeds local demand grid operators sometimes reduce output or switch farms off — a practice known as curtailment. That is expensive: 10 TWh of curtailed renewable power across the EU in 2024 is equivalent to the article’s €4.3 billion figure for wasted generation.
The mismatch shows up daily as a supply surplus during sunny afternoons and a rapid rise in demand after sundown — the pattern often called the duck curve. Without nearby storage, operators either export power at very low or negative prices or accept lost production. The AFRY analysis cited in the reporting highlights this operational bottleneck by placing hundreds of gigawatts of projects in queue, which keeps new solar, wind and heat-pump capacity from reaching consumers.
How used EV batteries map to the problem
Batteries pulled from vehicles rarely die; they typically reach end of service in cars when their usable energy falls below the threshold set for driving range, not because cells are unusable for storage. The reporting notes most retired packs still have significant energy left — enough to deliver stationary services for years — and modern passenger EVs carry much larger packs than a decade ago, improving the yield of second-life programmes.
That matters because the composition of the retired fleet is changing fast. IEA data show a massive ramp-up in new EV registrations: 215,000 sold in Europe in 2016 versus 4.2 million last year. The IEA also reports the EU added 27 GWh of grid batteries last year, while EVs supplied several times that amount through mobile storage, indicating a large future supply of second‑life packs as the vehicle fleet ages.
Existing pilots and practical use cases
Second-life batteries are already operating in commercial and community settings. The article describes a Californian project where hundreds of repurposed Honda EV packs form a 12 MWh facility that is paired with 1.5 MW of solar and sells energy and grid services into the California Independent System Operator market. That example shows how vehicle cells can provide capacity, shifting midday solar to evening peaks and offering frequency and other ancillary services.
Beyond utility-scale pilots, the reporting points at remote and off-grid opportunities. The World Bank estimate cited recommends roughly 160,000 mini-grids to reach unserved communities in Sub‑Saharan Africa, a use case where lower-cost second-life packs can replace or reduce diesel generation and support local renewables.
Barriers: recycling, safety and policy gaps
Reusing and recycling batteries are complementary but distinct routes. Recycling recovers critical minerals but requires lengthy preparation — discharge, dismantling, separation — and can expose workers and equipment to hazardous compounds such as hydrofluoric acid, a danger the article highlights. Those technical and safety costs raise the price of recycling and slow the economics of full-material recovery.
Repurposing faces its own hurdles: standardisation, testing protocols, warranties and grid interconnection rules vary across member states. The piece flags that many EU jurisdictions will need clearer regulatory frameworks and incentives to speed collection, certification and deployment of second‑life systems so they can be counted by network planners and included in connection offers.
| Item | Capacity | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Clean-energy projects in queues | 375 GW | AFRY figure for projects awaiting distribution connection |
| Battery-storage projects in queues | 455 GW | AFRY figure for storage projects awaiting connection |
| EU grid batteries added last year | 27 GWh | Installed stationary battery capacity in the EU, as stated |
How second-life batteries could change the balance
The case for
- Large, lower-cost pools of repurposed packs arriving as the EV fleet ages would provide local capacity and reduce curtailment where distribution constraints are binding.
- More distributed storage could reduce peak prices and defer some network upgrades by shifting generation to match demand peaks.
The case against
- If certification, safety protocols and recycling capacity do not scale, second-life deployments may remain niche and some retired packs will become waste streams.
- Uneven national rules across Europe could lock projects into small, fragmented markets, slowing standard commercial roll-outs and limiting the benefit to cross-border grids.
What to be careful about
- Insufficient testing and standardisation could leave repurposed batteries unable to secure grid connection or insurance.
- Recycling bottlenecks and hazardous processing steps risk creating worker-safety issues and higher end‑of‑life costs.
- Slow or inconsistent regulation across EU member states could fragment markets for second‑life systems and limit economies of scale.
- If most retired packs are small (older 22–24 kWh cars), the logistics of aggregation may outweigh per-unit value unless larger modern packs dominate retirements.
The bottom line
Repurposing EV batteries offers a near-term, practical way to reduce wasted wind and solar output and to relieve pressure on Europe’s congested distribution networks. The numbers cited — hundreds of gigawatts stuck in queues and 10 TWh curtailed in a single year — underline the size of the operational gap. To realise the potential of second‑life systems at scale, policy makers, network planners and industry must agree common testing, certification and interconnection rules, while expanding safe collection and recycling capacity so reused packs do not simply delay an end‑of‑life problem.
What to watch
- Watch for EU-level rules on second‑life battery certification and grid connection; no date has been set.
- Watch for national pilots scaling second‑life deployments beyond demonstrators; no date has been set.
Frequently asked questions
How much renewable energy was curtailed in Europe recently?
The piece reports 10 TWh of renewable generation was curtailed in the EU in 2024, which it values at €4.3 billion in lost electricity.
Do retired EV batteries have useful capacity for the grid?
Yes. The reporting states most EV packs retire with roughly 70–80% of their original capacity, making them suitable for stationary storage applications.
How large is the backlog of projects waiting to connect to Europe’s distribution grids?
In an AFRY study, distribution grid queues across Europe are shown to contain 455 GW of battery‑storage projects alongside 375 GW of planned clean‑energy capacity.
Related reading